SpineUniverse Case Study Library

Lumbar Radicular Symptoms in a 24-year-old Male

This case study is brought to you by:
What is this?

Patient History

A 24-year-old male in the United States Air Force complains of 5-month history of back pain radiating to the left buttock, leg and great toe. There was no inciting event. He rates his pain at 7/10. The pain is aggravated by lifting, coughing, bending, running and bending forward and relieved only slightly by rest. He is unable to perform his duties on the flight line because of his pain. He has failed to improve despite treatment with physical therapy and medications including prednisone. Epidural steroid injections gave approximately 25% decrease in symptoms for a short duration. The patient wishes for definitive treatment to return to the flight line.


A physical exam revealed a positive straight leg raise at 30° with pain radiating to left buttock and posterior thigh. He has no motor or sensory deficits. Deep tendon reflexes are normal and symmetric.


An MRI of the lumbar spine reveals a large, noncontained, subligamentous left paracentral herniated nucleus pulposus at L4-L5 with compression of the traversing L5 nerve root (Figure 1A, 1B).

pre-op T2 axial MRI showing HNP left L4-L5 with L5 nerve root compression
Figure 1A. T2 axial MRI showing HNP left L4-L5 with compression of L5 nerve root.

pre-op T2 sagittal MRI showing HNP left L4-L5 with L5 nerve root compression
Figure 1B. T2 sagittal MRI showing HNP, left L4-L5 with compression of L5 nerve root.

Suggest Treatment

Indicate how you would treat this patient by completing the following brief survey. Your response will be added to our survey results below.

Selected Treatment

This patient is an excellent candidate for decompressive microdiscectomy. Standard lumbar microdiscectomy performed using traditional techniques results in 85% to 95% good to excellent results in the immediate postoperative period. However, recurrence rates have been reported as high as 26% within one year after microdiscectomy,(1) and radicular pain secondary to epidural fibrosis has been reported as high as 21%.(2)

An alternative treatment is decompression via a HydroDiscectomy utilizing the SpineJet® Micro 3.8 System to remove tissue through a 4mm cannula system (Figure 2A, 2B). The SpineJet Micro 3.8 System uses high velocity water to pulverize the disc material and remove tissue through an evacuation tube in a controlled and safe manner.

SpineJet Micro 3.8 System Disposable Handpiece
Figure 2A. SpineJet Micro 3.8 System Disposable Handpiece

SpineJet Micro 3.8 System Access Cannula Set
Figure 2B. HydroDiscectomy Access Cannula Set

The cannula system has been designed to minimize the residual annular defect after decompression. The 4mm working cannula is inserted into the disc space over a dilator rather than cutting the annular fibers. After decompression, when the cannula is removed, the elasticity of the annular fibers reduces the size of the annulotomy. These factors contribute to minimizing the annulotomy thereby decreasing the rate of potential recurrent herniation.(3)

Additionally, performing the HydroDiscectomy through a cannula minimizes the intra-operative nerve root manipulation. This decreases the amount of postoperative epidural fibrosis and the potential for chronic nerve root irritation in the absence of recurrent herniation.

Lastly, the SpineJet Micro 3.8 System allows the surgeon to remove disc material precisely. The surgeon has complete control over how much or how little disc material is removed. This allows the decompression to be performed efficiently.



The patient was taken to the operating room and had a HydroDiscectomy performed at L4-L5 with decompression of the left L5 nerve root (Figure 3). The least amount of disc material required to decompress the nerve was removed. The patient tolerated the procedure without complications. At the first postoperative visit, 27 days after surgery, the patient had complete resolution of his leg pain. By two and a half months postoperatively, he was performing low-impact cardiovascular training 25 minutes per day without difficulty and was deemed fit for full duty. To return to the flight line, an MRI of the lumbar spine was required per USAF regulations. His repeat MRI 7 months postoperatively shows no residual herniation (Figure 4A, 4B).

HydroDiscectomy utilizes the SpineJet Micro 3.8 System to remove disc material
HydroDiscectomy utilizes the SpineJet Micro 3.8 System to remove disc material
Figure 3. HydroDiscectomy utilizes the SpineJet Micro 3.8 HydroSurgery System to remove disc material through a 4mm cannulated System.

post-op T2 axial MRI with no appreciable herniation
Figure 4A. 17 months postoperative T2 axial MRI with no appreciable herniation.

postop T2 sagittal MRI with no appreciable herniation
Figure 4B. 17 months postoperative T2 sagittal MRI with no appreciable herniation.

In a retrospective study of 27 patients, who underwent a HydroDiscectomy procedure with the SpineJet®, there were no recurrent herniations requiring revision decompression one year after surgery, compared to 6 of 34 patients (17.6%) who underwent traditional microdiscectomy who required a revision microdiscectomy within a year after surgery.(2)

Seven of the 34 patients in this study, treated with the traditional microdiscectomy, experienced postoperative radicular symptoms in the absence of reherniation at 3-month follow-up with pain similar to pre-operative pain. Only one patient of the 27 treated with HydroDiscectomy had radicular symptoms in the absence of recurrent herniation.(2) The difference in the rate of persistent leg pain and recurrent herniations between the two groups was statistically significant (p:<0.025).

Despite removal of a small amount of disc material, the postoperative MRI shows no residual herniation 7 months postoperatively. Additionally, there is no epidural fibrosis since there was little intra-operative manipulation of the nerve root.

1.Carragee, et al. A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior annular defect. Spine. 2006; 31(6) 653-657.

2.Hardenbrook M, White S. HydroDiscectomy: a novel approach to lumbar microdiscectomy. AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, 2007.

3.Carragee EJ, Ha MY, Suen PW, Kim D. Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and annular competence. JBJS. 2003; 85-A:102-108.

*Former Director of Spine Surgery
Portsmouth Naval Hospital
Portsmouth, VA

The view(s) expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense or the United States Government.

Case Discussion

Dr. Hardenbrook gives us an excellent example of a case that all too frequently is encountered by practicing spine surgeons that serve the active working population. This patient has presented with a classical lumbar disc herniation and left sided radiculopathy that has failed to respond to time and conservative measures. The surgical decision choice is relatively straightforward, as most would agree that a discectomy alone would be the operative treatment of choice.

However, this case also raises the troubling long-term issues raised by patients such as these. Because of the patient's young age and physically strenuous occupation and lifestyle, there is a significant risk of recurrent or progressive back pain apart from the radiculopathy. Furthermore, the broad-based paracentral MRI appearance of the herniation is equally troubling, as this particular geometry has been particularly problematic with regards to long-term back pain, as well in most surgeons' experiences. Thus, the art of managing this patient comes, not so much from the choice to operate but, instead from finding ways to minimize the incidence of recurrent or chronic back pain.

Whereas the classic choice was between limited fragmentectomy and an aggressive debulking of the disc, the new HydroDiscectomy tool offers the potential of simultaneously achieving both goals of fragment removal while still maintaining some degree of annular and posterior longitudinal ligament integrity. The small working cannula allowed for a minimized annulotomy that is optimal for both purposes. Although long-term data will be needed to support the benefits of this minimally invasive window, surgical intuition would seem to support this thought. Indeed, early data from studies utilizing annular repair devices have demonstrated the importance of annular integrity with regards to annular healing, reherniation rates, disc height loss, and chronic pain.


Get new patient cases delivered to your inbox

Sign up for our healthcare professional eNewsletter, SpineMonitor.
Sign Up!